Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.trubuild.io/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

Document quality is the biggest driver of evaluation quality. TruBuild can work with the documents your team already receives, but enterprise teams get the best results when they standardize what bidders submit and where each file is uploaded.

What to upload by workflow

WorkflowRequired documentsOptional documentsBest formats
Commercial evaluationReference BOQ or PTE, contractor priced BOQsCommercial PTC responses, revised rounds.xlsx, .xls, .csv, text-based .pdf
Technical evaluationRFP or criteria, contractor technical proposalsIssued technical PTCs, contractor responses.pdf, .docx, .xlsx
Tender queriesQuery register or tender documentsRFP context, prior response history, response template.xlsx, .pdf, .docx, .doc
AI chatProject or package context filesEvaluation artifacts and uploaded documentsAny supported project upload

Commercial document standards

Reference BOQ or PTE

The reference BOQ or PTE is the commercial baseline. It should be uploaded once and treated as controlled evidence.
  • Keep the BOQ in Excel whenever possible.
  • Use clear headers such as item number, description, unit, quantity, rate, and amount.
  • Avoid merged header cells, hidden rows, and decorative title blocks above the real table.
  • Keep units consistent across the file.
  • Keep subtotal and total rows distinct from priced line items.
  • Use a package for the tender package being awarded.
  • Use assets when commercial scope needs separate comparisons, such as towers, plots, zones, or workstreams.
  • Keep asset naming consistent with the tender strategy and award pack.

Contractor priced submissions

Upload each contractor’s commercial submission against that contractor. TruBuild uses a contractor-specific file layout when running commercial comparisons.
Require bidders to return the issued Excel template. This is the single highest-impact instruction for extraction quality and reduces manual alignment review.
  • Every expected contractor has at least one priced submission file.
  • Currency matches the package currency or the commercial team has noted the mismatch.
  • Revised submissions are uploaded to the right round or response stage.
  • Scanned-only PDFs have been OCR processed before upload.

Technical document standards

Technical evaluation depends on clear criteria and contractor proposal structure.
DocumentStandard
RFPNative PDF or Word with headings, criteria, appendices, and page numbers intact
Criteria matrixExcel or Word with criterion title, description, weight, and scoring guidance
Contractor proposalOne or more PDFs/Word files linked to the correct contractor
PTC responsesUploaded as round responses and linked to the affected contractor where possible
For post-tender clarification rounds, keep issued questions and contractor responses separate from the original proposal. That separation makes it easier to decide which criteria should be rerun and which scores should carry forward.

Tender query document standards

Tender queries support enterprise-style registers and controlled response generation.
FieldRecommendation
Tenderer nameUse the sender or bidder contact name consistently
Tenderer organizationMatch the package contractor name where possible
Query numberPreserve the external query number when importing
CategoryUse technical, commercial, contractual, or general
StatusKeep status current as queries move through assignment, draft, approval, sent, and closed
ReferencesCapture RFP section, drawing reference, circular reference, and amendment status where applicable

File quality checks

Open the PDF and try to select a sentence. If you cannot select text, OCR the file before upload.
Open the workbook and confirm the actual table starts near the top, headers are visible, and prices are not hidden behind formulas or merged blocks.
Use the same contractor name across package setup, file names, tender query imports, and PTC response documents.
Do not overwrite Round 1 evidence with Round 2 evidence. Upload revisions as round responses or create a new round.

Naming conventions

Enterprise teams should pick a convention before the first large tender. A simple pattern works well:
<package>-<contractor>-<workflow>-<round>-<date>.<ext>
Examples:
hvac-contractor-a-commercial-r1-2026-04-20.xlsx
hvac-contractor-a-technical-r1-2026-04-20.pdf
hvac-issued-ptc-r2-2026-05-02.xlsx
hvac-query-responses-circular-03-2026-05-08.docx

Data handling

Uploaded files are stored as package, asset, contractor, workflow, stage, and round evidence. Access follows the project and package roles configured for your organization.

Troubleshooting

Check whether the price columns were hidden, merged, split across multiple sheets, or supplied as scanned PDF. Re-upload a clean Excel file where possible.
Confirm the contractor exists on the package and the file is uploaded against that contractor, not only at package level.
Check proposal structure and criteria quality. Vague criteria and poorly sectioned proposals produce weaker justifications.
Normalize tenderer organization names and preserve prior response history. Duplicate detection improves when historical responses are consistently categorized.

Commercial evaluation

Run a commercial comparison after files are ready.

Tender queries

Manage query imports, approvals, and circulars.